/cars
/jobs
/homes
/boats
/ld
/buy
/news
/mids





Comcast's bandwidth limit irks some users

Story comments (if available)
Print
Add to Facebook
Google bookmark

ADVERTISEMENT
HomesInAnnapolis.com

Edgewater

Annapolis
Published September 07, 2008

MINNEAPOLIS - Comcast's plan to put a cap on consumer Internet use worries some customers who have come to take unfettered Web surfing for granted, even though most users won't be affected by the move.

Beginning Oct. 1, Comcast will limit use of Internet bandwidth - a measure of all a person's monthly downloads and uploads of text, graphics, music, movies, photos and other information. The company said it reserves the right to terminate any residential customer who disregards company warnings and twice violates a limit of 250 gigabytes per month. Previously, the company didn't have a specific limit.

The idea is to keep bandwidth hogs from ruining the Internet experience for other residential customers, because the cable network is a shared medium of limited bandwidth capacity, Comcast said.

But that has some Comcast customers worried. Comcast provides about 100,000 Anne Arundel County customers with telecommunications services.

"Your typical Comcast Internet user will not be affected, but the power users - people that watch movies or TV online, or that download a lot of video or software - will be hurt," said Ryan Coleman, a Comcast Internet customer in Minneapolis who edits photos for a college magazine and downloads 40 to 80 gigabytes of data every week. "I have a feeling that I might be dead in the water in October."

Others are concerned about what this means for the Internet's future.

"It's absolutely critical that the Internet remain a level playing field, and that no one have control over what runs over it," said Steve Borsch of Eden Prairie, Minn.

Mr. Borsch runs a business and blogs about technology using Comcast's Internet service. He said the bandwidth limit is a bad move because it hurts Internet video services while helping Comcast's cable TV service.

Some analysts agree.

"A bandwidth limit discourages consumers from downloading or streaming Internet video, particularly of high-definition video," said S. Derek Turner, research director for Free Press, a Massachusetts-based nonprofit public policy group dealing with Internet and media issues. "That helps preserve Comcast's traditional cable TV service."

Comcast said such concerns are overblown. The company's monthly bandwidth limit is so high - the equivalent of downloading about 62,500 songs - that fewer than 1 percent of its customers are likely to be affected, said spokesman Charlie Douglas at Comcast's Philadelphia headquarters. Today, the average Comcast customer uses only a tiny fraction of the limit, he said, or about 2 to 3 gigabytes a month.

But Mr. Turner said the bandwidth limit is likely to affect more Comcast Internet users in the near future because of products such as Apple TV that can transfer Internet video to television sets.

"Comcast's 250-gigabyte bandwidth cap, while very high now, won't be high in the future," Mr. Turner said. "The way the Olympics were viewed on the Internet signals that consumers are ready to embrace online content."

Even today, someone watching eight hours a day of a standard-definition video or four hours a day of high-definition video could run afoul of Comcast's bandwidth cap, Mr. Turner said.

Mr. Douglas said Comcast will periodically review the bandwidth limit as online video viewing increases, but he declined to say whether the company would increase it.

Comcast has said that the bandwidth cap is unrelated to a recent Federal Communications Commission finding that Comcast was improperly limiting the ability of its customers to use BitTorrent, a popular file-sharing program. On Thursday, Comcast said it was appealing the FCC's ruling.

 

Reader comments: ( Post )
Comments solely reflect the views of and are the responsibility of users, not Capital Gazette Communications, Inc. or its suite of online properties including HometownAnnapolis.com, CapitalOnline.com, HometownGlenBurnie.com, and others. Readers may find some comments offensive or inaccurate. To comment, users agree to abide by rules of participation. If you believe a comment violates these rules, please notify us.
2 months 25 days 16 hours ago
why?
If the change effects less then one percent of there customers then why are they doing it at all? There logic dosent make sense unles it effects more people then they are admitting to.
K. Overman - arnold, MD

 

Post a comment
By posting a comment you acknowledge that you have read and will abide by the rules of participation.
To post comments, you must have a Hometown Account. Join now!
Subject:
Comment:




Advertisement

Contact Us ¦ Register ¦ Send Us News Tips
Capital Gazette Newspapers ¦ 2000 Capital Dr. ¦ Annapolis, MD 21401 ¦ 410-268-5000
HometownAnnapolis.com ¦ HometownGlenBurnie.com ¦ BowieBlade.com
Subscribe ¦ Buy a Newspaper ¦ Advertise ¦ Classifieds ¦ Jobs ¦ Restaurants ¦ Local Web Directory
Archives ¦ Calendar ¦ Cars & Boats ¦ Hotels & Lodging ¦ 2008 Readers Choice Awards
¦ Multimedia ¦ Photo Store ¦ Site Map ¦ Tour Annapolis ¦ Traffic Cams ¦ USNA ¦ Weather

Copyright © 2008 Capital Gazette Communications, Inc. , Annapolis, Md. ¦ Privacy Policy & Terms of Service