Wine merchants want freedom to mail you a bottle

By CHERYL MATTIX, Cecil Whig

Published 11/05/09

ELKTON, Md. (AP) — An advocacy group that is trying to convince Maryland's General Assembly to allow direct shipments by the state's wine retailers has the support of local liquor store owners.

Find Us On Facebook

AP VIDEO more>>

Greg Birney, the owner of Cherry Hill Liquors off of Singerly Road, and Robert Murray, one of the owners of State Line Liquors on Maryland 279 near the state line, both said they're behind the current effort to legalize direct shipments that's being spearheaded by Marylanders for Better Beer and Wine Laws.

"As a store owner that specializes in Maryland produced wines, I understand the problems facing the survival and...

This story has expired!
You can purchase the full text in our news archives.

YOUR COMMENTS

RULES OF PARTICIPATION

If you encounter other problems, please email nlundskow@capitalgazette.com and include your name, username, and any errors or messages that are displayed. The more information you can provide, the better able we will be to assist you.

In order to post or vote on a comment, you must be signed in with a hometownannapolis account.

Take a look at a summary of Commenting Guidelines.

Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0 1

TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS, NOW - 2009-11-06 17:37:37

Thanks Adam, your organization [MBBWL] is doing a great job.

But, everyone has to tell their Delegates & Senator that we've been waiting too long. A face-to-face visit is the best way to get real attention. A snail-mail letter is also good. eMail is OK, but the other two option are better. But, any communication is better than none.

The distributors are actively lobbying the legislators -- we are the citizens, we must learn to lobby, too.

Paul Hoffstein, Eastport

unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking. Why is this comment hidden?

Paul Hoffstein - Annapolis, MD - Karma: Neutral

Get Involved in Changing The Laws - 2009-11-05 20:02:09

We were really pleased to see such great coverage and hope all will get involved with our cause to change these antiquated laws! As the article urges, please sign up with Marylanders for Better Beer & Wine Laws at http://bit.ly/2OcHMz to learn more about the fight and how you can help.

unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking. Why is this comment hidden?

Adam Borden - Baltimore, MD - Karma: Neutral

CATCH UP WITH THE 21ST CENTURY - 2009-11-05 18:54:18

The benefits are almost Universal. All the wineries, many retailers and all adult consumers will benefit by Direct Shipping.

Only the distributors object.

So they bring up red herrings:
(a) Underage drinkers will be buying Boonws Farm [really they said that] over the internet.
(b) The Best in America Three-Tiered system will be destroyed.
(c) the out-of-state wineries will not pay sales tax.

Answers:
(a) Kids don't wait for anything -- not a week for booze. Kids do not drink wine. Shipping costs $40 or so for a case. The package must be signed for by someone over 21. Kids buy beer -- at the local liquor store -- with a fake ID or by using a friend.
(b) 31 States, many with 3-tiered systems co-exist with Direct Shipping. New Hampshire has only State Stores, but allows Direct Shipping. VA has the 3-tiered system, too, and has prospered. Retailers, wineries and consmers are happy. THe State collects taxes. NH, a tiny state collected $250,000. It would be $1,000,000 to MD.
(c) They don't stiff the other 31 states. The MD Comptroller is in favor.

Indeed, everyone is in favor except the Distributors and their bought Delegates & Senators. The MAJORITY of Delegates SPONSORED the 2009 bill. How could all this be thwarted by a few bought Delegates & Senators???

unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking. Why is this comment hidden?

Paul Richards - Annapolis, MD - Karma: Neutral

First things. first.. - 2009-11-05 16:10:56

Before we do something as luxurious as send beer and wine by mail, perhaps we could do something more practical ---allow it to be sold in Grocery stores !!!! I mean really people, what's up with that ?

unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking. Why is this comment hidden?

Fred Shubbie - , - Karma: Terrible

Distributor Oligopoly - 2009-11-05 14:56:28

In this day and age there's no excuse for legislating a middle man. Distributors do nothing but mark up the cost and limit the selection to the end consumer.

I've been to many wineries around the country, and it's always been frustrating that I couldn't have any bottles shipped home to Maryland, while friends from other states never had a problem.

unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking. Why is this comment hidden?

Scott S. - Annapolis, MD - Karma: Excellent

Weak Argument - 2009-11-05 11:35:08

"Opponents, however, argue that a direct shipment law would threaten jobs at distribution centers."

Opponents are the distributors... who would now have to COMPETE. Imagine that... free market competition. What an idea that is.

Maryland's beer and wine laws are stone age as far as I'm concerned. They are now there to protect existing businesses and that's it.

We should be able to buy Beer and Wine with our groceries or through the internet... boy would we see some competition then.

unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking. Why is this comment hidden?

Bruce K - Annapolis, MD - Karma: Excellent