He needed an LED light - an energy-saving Light-Emitting Diode bulb - that could plug into standard fluorescent-bulb light boxes. His store, Ski Haus Sports Center and Cycleworks, like many other commercial spaces, has a ceiling festooned with fluorescent lighting fixtures.
So Cerasani did a little research to find a company in China that could manufacture a retrofitted bulb, and now he's reaping the environmental and financial rewards of his ingenuity.
Baltimore Gas and Electric Co. has committed to giving Cerasani an incentive...
| This story has expired! You can purchase the full text in our news archives. |

If you encounter other problems, please email nlundskow@capitalgazette.com and include your name, username, and any errors or messages that are displayed. The more information you can provide, the better able we will be to assist you.
In order to post or vote on a comment, you must be signed in with a hometownannapolis account.
Take a look at a summary of Commenting Guidelines.
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
1
Utilities - 2009-11-06 12:25:00
My bill from BGE shows both the electric supply and delivery charged on a per kWh basis. Both portions are higher when I use more electricity. My point is that I can't see BGE wanting its customers to have lower bills. They may want us to use less electricity, but they still want to grow their profits. That means charging higher rates so that we end up paying at least the same in total even though we use less of their product.
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking. Why is this comment hidden?
Scott S. - Annapolis, MD - Karma: Excellent
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
1
It Does Make Sense - 2009-11-06 09:08:33
For Scott S.: The program does make sense if you understand that utilities are no longer paid by how much power they deliver, but rather just for doing the delivery. That's why you're able to buy your power from Washington Gas or another provider and BGE or PEPCO delivers it. You're right that the program is in part designed to drive down demand to avoid building costly infrastructure--but that model isn't BGE's. It comes from state and federal agencies that realize that we can't just keep building new power plants. To do that, you have to take the incentive away from utilities to earn more by producing more power. This is a good thing and there are programs like this elsewhere. No conspiracies.
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking. Why is this comment hidden?
MDDem08 MDDem08 - Annapolis, MD - Karma: Neutral
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 1
1
Fuzzy Math - 2009-11-05 14:40:17
Going from 45 watts/hr to 15 watts/hr is a reduction of two-thirds, not one-third.
I'm somewhat skeptical of this program...how does it really benefit BGE? I can't think of another business that asks its customers to use less of its product. My guess is that they're reaching capacity and can't produce much more energy without building more costly infrastructure. However, as a public company, they have to increase profits each year to survive. So if they can't sell more energy, that means they'll need to charge more for it.
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking. Why is this comment hidden?
Scott S. - Annapolis, MD - Karma: Excellent
If you encounter other problems, please email nlundskow@capitalgazette.com and include your name, username, and any errors or messages that are displayed. The more information you can provide, the better able we will be to assist you.