While nuclear power might be preferable to fossil fuel-based energy sources, it is "diverting and delaying action," said economist John Howley, who was part...
| This story has expired! You can purchase the full text in our news archives. |
|
Environment
Published
11/18/09
BALTIMORE - As Maryland closes in on the construction of a third reactor at Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant in Lusby, an environmental organization has released a report calling nuclear power a step backward in the nation's race to reduce pollution. Find Us On Facebook
The Environment Maryland Research and Policy Center report, released Tuesday, calls nuclear power "too slow and too expensive," an energy source that makes little economic sense in combating climate change.
While nuclear power might be preferable to fossil fuel-based energy sources, it is "diverting and delaying action," said economist John Howley, who was part...
Copyright © Capital Gazette Communications LLC, 2012.
See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use |
| #1 - English county's official language? (28 comments) |
| #2 - Right Stuff: Judge O'Malley's decision (21 comments) |
| #3 - Animal Control: Injured pit bull used as 'bait dog' (12 comments) |
| #4 - Anne Arundel cracks down on land use offenses (11 comments) |
| #5 - Woman gets life in prison for killing dentist (8 comments) |
If you encounter other problems, please email nlundskow@capitalgazette.com and include your name, username, and any errors or messages that are displayed. The more information you can provide, the better able we will be to assist you.
In order to post or vote on a comment, you must be signed in with a hometownannapolis account.
Take a look at a summary of Commenting Guidelines.
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 1
1
No more deadly Nuke plants - 2009-11-19 22:05:16
The private insurance and banking companies will not insure nor provide financing for a nuclear power plant.
We the American tax payer will foot the bill.And do you realize every bit of nuclear waste that was generated at Calvert cliff is still on site in swimming pools
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking. Why is this comment hidden?
Cliff Layman - lothian, MD - Karma: Neutral
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 1
1
A real step backward - 2009-11-18 18:18:43
Maryland needs nuclear power. We really should build 2 reactors to get ahead of the curve. We could be in a position to export energy instead of import. The revenue could be used to finance wind, solar and other sources. What we don't need is power supply shortages that would occur without nuclear power. Does anyone want the grid problems of California?
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking. Why is this comment hidden?
Thomas Frankowski - Annapolis, MD - Karma: Neutral
If you encounter other problems, please email nlundskow@capitalgazette.com and include your name, username, and any errors or messages that are displayed. The more information you can provide, the better able we will be to assist you.