But the proposal is already in question, despite the House speaker's support, said one of the bill's architects, because Senate opposition could kill the careful reforms.
The bill would make it more difficult for health insurers to increase premiums, require neutral experts to testify in court cases, protect physicians' private apologies and continue the state's study of malpractice issues.
After a tense discussion, the House Judiciary Committee voted almost unanimously...
| This story has expired! You can purchase the full text in our news archives. |
If you encounter other problems, please email nlundskow@capitalgazette.com and include your name, username, and any errors or messages that are displayed. The more information you can provide, the better able we will be to assist you.
In order to post or vote on a comment, you must be signed in with a hometownannapolis account.
Take a look at a summary of Commenting Guidelines.
If you encounter other problems, please email nlundskow@capitalgazette.com and include your name, username, and any errors or messages that are displayed. The more information you can provide, the better able we will be to assist you.