Now, after lawmakers decided they couldn't resolve the divisive issue themselves, the voters will decide on a constitutional amendment to legalize slots.
To supporters, slot machines are a crucial revenue source in the face of big budget deficits that are likely to force painful cuts. Opponents decry gambling as a social curse with dubious economic benefits.
If voters approve a...
| This story has expired! You can purchase the full text in our news archives. |

If you encounter other problems, please email nlundskow@capitalgazette.com and include your name, username, and any errors or messages that are displayed. The more information you can provide, the better able we will be to assist you.
In order to post or vote on a comment, you must be signed in with a hometownannapolis account.
Take a look at a summary of Commenting Guidelines.
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
0
Fair article - 2008-11-01 09:29:58
This is a very fair and balanced editorial. The Washington Post editorial was just a list of the anti-slots talking points.
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking. Why is this comment hidden?
gg M. - Salisbury, MD - Karma: Neutral
If you encounter other problems, please email nlundskow@capitalgazette.com and include your name, username, and any errors or messages that are displayed. The more information you can provide, the better able we will be to assist you.