The case relates to a 2001 state contract with Diebold Election Systems Inc. for the voting system, which computer experts later reported to have security problems and reliability concerns. The state says it incurred expenses to correct the problems so the system would be reliable in elections.
The added costs resulted from consulting and technical services and personnel, as well as materials and supplies, the state contends.
"Under...
| This story has expired! You can purchase the full text in our news archives. |
If you encounter other problems, please email nlundskow@capitalgazette.com and include your name, username, and any errors or messages that are displayed. The more information you can provide, the better able we will be to assist you.
In order to post or vote on a comment, you must be signed in with a hometownannapolis account.
Take a look at a summary of Commenting Guidelines.
If you encounter other problems, please email nlundskow@capitalgazette.com and include your name, username, and any errors or messages that are displayed. The more information you can provide, the better able we will be to assist you.