The charges filed against Sgt. Max Weinstein in the wake of the May 21 chase - which went the wrong way down Aris T. Allen Boulevard and injured three police officers - range from failure to perform required duty to neglect of duty, his attorney said.
They are not criminal charges.
It is unclear if the department took such actions against anyone else involved in the chase or the 90-minute stakeout and investigation that led up to it. Police yesterday declined to comment about the Internal Affairs Investigation, which looked at why officers did nothing to disable an abandoned stolen vehicle or unload a sawed-off shotgun they spotted inside.
The department reassigned one supervisor and two officers to administrative duties with pay for their involvement in the stakeout that led up to the chase. Police declined to comment on their status with the department this week, but Charlotte Weinstein, Sgt. Weinstein's wife and attorney, said the police powers of both her husband and a 16-year veteran corporal who first searched the van remain suspended.
Mrs. Weinstein blasted the department last week for singling out her husband - who she said was the sergeant-in-charge for only the first 40 minutes of the investigation - and overlooking others who she believes are at least equally at fault.
"I feel confident in saying none of the other supervisors or officers involved in this incident have received this level of punishment or have been asked to resign even though they did nothing differently from my client during the 20 minutes that (he) had supervision of the incident prior to the beginning of the pursuit," she said in an e-mail, calling for a civilian review board to investigate. She noted that her husband's shift ended at 3 p.m. and that before he left for the day he asked his boss if there was anything else he could do. She said he was told "no."
"The depth and nature of these charges are extraordinary by all stretches of the imagination," said Mrs. Weinstein, questioning the department's ability to police the community if this was how it policed itself.
"The department is making my client a scapegoat while protecting others involved to placate a community that just wants and deserves honest answers. My client's goal is vindicate himself and provide those answers."
Councilmen Josh Cohen and Jamie Benoit, both of whom questioned the department's handling of the police chase in June, declined to comment about the Internal Affairs investigation or Mrs. Weinstein's concerns.
"There are established procedures to file a grievance or to appeal a personnel decision," said Mr. Cohen. "Any such actions should be handled impartially and without political interference. Therefore it would be inappropriate for a council member to comment on or seek to influence the department's handling of an internal personnel matter."
Officer O'Brien Atkinson, president of FOP Lodge 70, could not be reached for comment. In June, he complained the department overreacted when it suspended the police powers of the three officers.
"That is not routine. That is not protocol," Officer Atkinson said of the suspensions. He described the suspensions as a "knee-jerk reaction" to the councilmen's questions, which were included in an article in The Capital.
Questions
Three people - one teenager and two adults - pleaded guilty in county courtrooms earlier this year to their parts in the chase and theft of a minivan owned by the Naval Base Support Unit in Dahlgren, Va.
When the men entered their respective pleas, prosecutors revealed:
Two officers entered the stolen minivan on May 21 at the Harry S Truman park and ride lot outside Annapolis shortly before the chase. Inside, they spotted shotgun shells and a sawed off shotgun
The officers turned off the van's lights, but did not remove the shotgun. They called for back up.
Two detectives came to the scene to stake out the van, but did not notice the three people walk up and get inside. Prosecutors said the detectives did not know anyone was in the van until it started to drive away.
No one disabled the van during the stakeout to make sure it couldn't be driven away.
Mrs. Weinstein alleged additional gaffes that day. Specifically, she said the lieutenant in charge didn't have his radio on when the chase started.
"The lieutenant had his radio turned down and did not know the pursuit was occurring until later in the pursuit," she said, noting how that officer was not reprimanded.
The chase
The 15-year-old driver admitted in July he stole the van, led police on the high-speed chase and assaulted a police officer. He was indefinitely committed to the custody of the state Department of Juvenile Services.
In October, his two passengers, Stephon Delorean Fortune, 18, of Washington, D.C., and James Lorenzo Thomas Jr., 22, of Camp Springs, pleaded guilty to unlawful taking of a vehicle. A judge sentenced each to four years in prison, but suspended all but one year to be served at a county jail.
Prosecutors told the court that police found the stolen van about 2:20 p.m. after getting a call about a suspicious man looking in car windows inside the parking lot at 200 Harry S Truman Parkway.
A police officer drove around the lot and noticed the van was parked and empty, but had its headlights on. He tried the door, found it unlocked and turned off the van's lights. In the process, however, he noticed damage to the steering column and a shotgun and some shells on the floorboard.
He called for back up and two detectives arrived at 3:25 p.m. and took over the scene.
Prosecutors said the detectives let the three people walk up to the van at 3:48 p.m. and get inside. When the vehicle started moving, the detectives ordered the men out of the vehicle and tried to block their escape with their unmarked car to no avail.
The van sped out of the parking lot, heading north on Riva Road, east on Forest Drive, and south on Solomons Island Road, police said. The van then went the wrong way down an exit ramp to get onto Aris T. Allen Boulevard - driving east in the westbound lanes.
The chase ended on Newtowne Drive after the van headed down the dead-end road and turned around.
A police officer in a marked patrol car tried to block the road, causing the 15-year-old driver to swerve and hit the detective's unmarked car head on. Police said the pursuit ended at 3:57 p.m. - about 90 minutes after the officer found the van.
The young driver of the van tried to run from the wreck, but a county police officer used a Taser to stop him.
The two passengers in the van were pulled from the back of the wreckage and arrested without incident.
If you encounter other problems, please email ewiffin@capitalgazette.com and include your name, username, and any errors or messages that are displayed. The more information you can provide, the better able we will be to assist you.
In order to post or vote on a comment, you must be signed in with a hometownannapolis account.
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
Comment removed by HometownAnnapolis staff. - January 7, 2009
Staff message:
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking
- Karma: Terrible
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
A.A.Co. Council Meeting - January 3, 2009
After reading the comments of others, I am really happy to find that I am not the only person with many questions unanswered. Absolutely no one is coming forward with a logical reason as to why these 2 officers, with over 40 years of combined service to the residents of Anne Arundel Co. are being singled out, and their lives and those of their families, being made a living nightmare. There have been rumors that the officers were suspended( for 8 months now) because of an erroe in judgement. If this is so --- then don't you think that the Officers who made this suspension decision have also made a HUGE error in judgement? Perhaps we need others to step up and judge those who are makine the judgement! Once again, the Anne Arundel County Council will have their Legislative meeting on Monday January 5,2009 at 7 p.m. It is held at the Arundel Center , 44 Calvert St. in Annapolis. Please, lets show up and support these guys. Maybe even help find some answers, or find someone who will.
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking
Carol S. - Glen Burnie, MD - Karma: Bad
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
Police chase - January 3, 2009
I just read an article on ABC News Channel 2 about the police chase in Wicomico County, which involved the Md. State Police, and Wicomico Co. Sheriffs Dept. The criminals car and 2 police vehicles were smashed up. They got the bad guy. I just hope that Wicomico County has more regard for their officers than A.A.County has. Good Luck.
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking
Carol S. - Glen Burnie, MD - Karma: Bad
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
This isn't right ! ! ! - January 2, 2009
Why is it that in our social system and specially in MD we keep protecting the criminals and bashing our Police Officers (P/Os)? A call is placed; and the police responds to the scene. They decide to take a closer look at who is driving the vehicle. I can?t find anything wrong with that. The police tries to investigate to find out who is driving this alleged stolen vehicle, which is a normal task of an investigation process. P/Os are investigators and they are paid for that specific duty. Right? Right. So, why is it that Sgt. Max Weinstein can be charged with neglect of duty even when he was off-duty at time the time that the chase took place? This whole situation is a wrong. P/Os are part of the permanent liberties that we enjoy in this country, and because of it we are safer in this country than many other nations. P/Os are liable for any inaccuracy on duty and when they are off-duty. The wages are not worth the P/Os physical and mental pressure; furthermore, the stress inflicted on family and friends. Isn?t it enough pressure that P/Os have to be on the lookout for criminals that they had previously arrested for crimes and who wanders our Streets? The death of Det. Thomas Newman of the BPD who was fatally shot while off duty on 11/23/2002 outside of a bar when he was leaving the bar accompanied by his girlfriend is a perfect example of this. Be mindful that they put their lives at risk every day after they are sworn as P/Os. His decision was taken under good faith, and that should say something. This action is a positive reinforcement to the criminal which tells them that they have more power than those who keeps them in check. Why is it that we put more emphasis on innocents P/Os than in real criminals? If he had acted with malice, I?m in complete agreement that he should be charged and convicted, but this is not the case on this situation. A reprimand in this case is unjust, and why cut him off his services?
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking
A. Reyes - Baltimore, MD - Karma: Bad
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
WHAT ABOUT THE CRIMINAL?? - January 2, 2009
SO THE CRIMINALS IN THIS CASE ARE GETTING ONE YEAR IN JAIL, THE JUVENILE IN THE CASE WILL MOST LIKLEY SPEND A FEW MONTHS IN SHELDINGHAM AND DUE TO LACK OF BOYS DETENTION FACILITIES IN MARYLAND WILL GO HOME. HOWEVER, SGNT WEINSTEIN HAS TO PAY FOR THE REST OF HIS LIFE FOR SOMETHING THAT 3 OTHER OFFICERS FAILED TO DO. STOP 3 BOYS FROM GETTING IN THE VAN TO BEGIN WITH. NOTE TO JUDGE...LETTING GO A BOY WHO STOLE A VAN WITH A GUN IN IT, AND NOT GIVING HIM PROPER PUNISHMENT, COULD RESULT IN THE DEATH OF AN INOCENT PERSON. IN 2003 A CAR WAS STOLEN AND THE JUVENILE WAS GIVEN PROBATION, IN 2004 HE SHOT HIS GIRLFRIEND, IN 2006 SHE DIED FROM HER INJURY, IN 2007 HE STABBED ANOTHER PERSON. PLEASE USE MY TAX MONEY TO PUNISH THE CRIMINAL, NOT THE POLICE. SO ANOTHER FAMILY MAY BE SAVED FROM THE PAIN MINE STILLS FEELS.
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking
chrissy callender - linthicum, MD - Karma: Bad
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
Cindy - January 1, 2009
You make a weak argument. Under the auspice of your rationale, we would have what, five people who would be allowed to criticize the Presidency? I agree that no one can fully understand what LEOs have to go through on a daily basis (unless they have done it) and I do not agree with one iota of her statements. However, as public servants police officers must be allowed to be the subject of public scrutiny as this only allows there to be more transparency into what they do on a daily basis. It does disturb me, especially here, when officers seem to get treated far worse than the criminals that they are trying to prevent from causing the public any further harm. Carol-----yeah, the details as to what transpired in "setting up surveillence" of the vehicle and the following problems is a bit sketchy. I should have been more clear in that I assummed upon initial discovery of the firearm, they stopped the search, obtained a search warrant, the detectives showed up and they "staked out" the vehicle. The timeline for these events might tell us more, but unfortunately, much of facts are not being released until completion of the investigation. This might shed light onto what happened and prove that the officers were justified, or just show us that they erred in their judgement. Either way, I don't see how anyone could be fired based off what has been printed/published/released thus far. People mess up, no one's perfect. Let's learn what we can from this, stop the finger pointing and scapegoating and move on.
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking
Johnathan Locke - Edgewater, MD - Karma: Good
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
AAPolice Officer - January 1, 2009
After a 21 yr. career it seems rather harsh to ask an officer to resign. Isn't there any way to reprimand Sgt. Weinstein rather than ending his career? His loyalty and experience must count for something. Doesn't the dept. owe him some loyalty? AA County needs officers with his experience. Are there other incidences that the public is unaware of?
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking
Ann M. - Ocean City, MD - Karma: Bad
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
Punishment well deserved? - December 31, 2008
To: Jamie H. - Annapolis MD So tell me Jamie, exactly how many years of Police experience do you have under your belt? Before you EVER criticize the actions of ANY Officer, put yourself in the shoes of that person who's job I'm sure you not only couldn't do, but don't have the guts to do! I'm betting you're just another one of those
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking
Cindy S. - belcamp, MD - Karma: Bad
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
And What About... - December 31, 2008
And what about the criminals in this case? What charges have been brought against them? Is the teenager going to get a slap on the wrist? When you talk about public safety, don't you want criminals off the streets? Yeah, nobody's perfect, but slamming someone with 61 charges smells a bit fishy to me...there is more to the story...
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking
J. Jovkovich - Annapolis, MD - Karma: Neutral
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
Food for thought - December 31, 2008
Being closely connected to the facts of this case, we have forgotten the fact that there remains another police corporal with over 20 years experience remaining on desk duty suspended of his police powers. As for Mr. Johnathan Locke, remember, there are laws that restrict officers from tampering with evidence!(ref gun) This is the result of Mr. Cohen expressing his interest in the chase itself, however claiming that his interest was only to be used later as a learning experience. Now Mr.Cohen has nothing to say knowing two officers remain off the street! Someone has forgotten about the detectives who allowed the suspects to get into the car in the first place. Regardless of what happened, police are not trained to disable a vehicle, and even if they are, THAT vehicle was not reported stolen. It was only suspicious at the time, and the fact that it was a government vehicle made matters worse for those involved. Shortly after this incident, AAPD purchased "Terminator" stop sticks, specifically designed for incidents like this. Where were they before? Hang in there guys, and be sure to find a good lawyer that will expose the (possible) cover up with Anne Arundel County! As for the posting by Jamie H. You need to read the facts before you post anything. The detectives that were involved in the chase are still working. The two suspended are being used as scapegoats.
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking
Carol B. - Pasadena, MD - Karma: Bad
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
Punishment-Well Deserved - December 31, 2008
These officers involved in this case have received a well deserved punishment. How much training and fore thought did the officers need to before their first response was to protect the lives and safety of citizens? It's only common sense. Why on earth.... Did it never dawn on them to remove the weapon for the vehicle or to simply prevent the offenders from ever entering the vehicle in the first place. There should have not been a vehicle chase. During the chase the officers involved demonstrated DIS-REGARD, and NEGLECT for the public safety. If these officers represent the department's FINEST? - I dare see the rest. My guess is these cops have been watching TOO cop shows. Wake up and turn off the TV this is real life. You can't drive a car down the wrong way on a highway at a high rate of speed - firing your gun out the window. -
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking
Jamie H. - Annapolis, MD - Karma: Neutral
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
Score - December 31, 2008
So far, the score: County Officials/Councilmen-- 0 Officers - 10 ( counting myself) The police don't catch the bad guys, they get criticized The police catch the bad guys, they get criticized.
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking
Aimee V. - Pasadena, MD - Karma: Bad
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
Monday Morn Quarterbacks - December 31, 2008
You gotta love those Monday morning quarterbacks who can sit back and criticize an event in hindsight. The police are the good guys people! They are doing the best they can within the restrictions placed on them. Sure, there were lessons learned in this case, but do you ask a 20 year veteran to resign? There's a lot more to this story or the AA County leadership is a bunch of morons. I'm all about being held accountable, but Sgt Weinstein needs to fight this tooth and nail.
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking
Charles J. - St Johnsbury, VT - Karma: Bad
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
Maybe its just me - December 31, 2008
Im not sure if its just me, but it seems common sense should have dictated removing/taking possession of the shotgun upon its discovery (after seeing the state of the vehicle). However, I'm not sure that there was sufficient time to disable the vehicle safely. Leveling 61 charges against anyone is not unheard of, as many charges are often levied against criminals in an attempt to elicit a plea or get at least one to stick, even though this isn't a criminal case. However, I will agree with all that it is a bit odd that he is being singled out in this mess and the point could have been made with one charge. To be honest, the intent was there to try and apprehend the perpetrators, just the methods used leading up to the chase were probably not proper procedure. Let's not forget, these "bad guys" chose to run, the police didn't force them to. Heck, they even tried to get them to stop at gun point. So I don't see how any of this warrants anyone losing their job. Gotta love AACo, MD.
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking
Johnathan Locke - Edgewater, MD - Karma: Good
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
Officer asked to res - December 31, 2008
I have followed Scott Daugherty's column for some time, and find him to be a very fair and accurate reporter. Once again I am reading about the police officers who were suspended in May because they were apparently doing their job. This should be a lesson to other Police Officers in Anne Arundel County. Do not take action, do not get involved. This could be you. Can you imagine the hell these officers must be going through for 7 months of not knowing if they would have a job or not? And for what? And has it taken 7 months to dig up 61....repeat 61 charges against Sgt. Weinstein. Is this not overkill? And Councilman Cohen...Why do you not wish to be involved with this now, when you are the one who initiated this mess. Too late to shake the dirt off of your shoes now,sir. Is there no one in this county who will stand up for these officers? I cannot help but wonder what is the real deal with the treatment of these officers. And it was particularly nice of Anne Arundel County to save this present for Sgt. Weinstein and his family just for Christmas! How sweet. Good Luck, and God Bless. Rally Around Folks. Don't let these guys down.
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking
Carol S. - Glen Burnie, MD - Karma: Bad
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
Kangaroo court anyone? - December 30, 2008
This whole situation seems to me something out of a bad Law and Order episode. It looks like one man is being sacrificed in order to satisfy and protect a select few. Councilmen Josh Cohen and Jamie Benoit both questioned the departments handling of this chase in June, but now state "...It's inappropriate for a council member to comment on or seek to influence the departments handling of an internal personnel matter." Was the initial questions the reason for the "knee-jerk" reaction to this whole mess? Is someone being protected? Is that why Sgt. Weinstein is the only one being hung out to dry here? Was there no one else involved? Who handled the situation when Sgt. Weinstein was relieved? There is a significant amount of time where Sgt. Weinstein was not involved, that has not been explained, so who took over? And when another Police Officer took over wouldn't that absolve Sgt. Weinstein of any further responsibility? And how did two officers and two detectives miss the three suspects returning to the vehicle? And why did NONE of the officers and detectives on the scene disable the vehicle? As far as I know Sgt. Weinstein cannot be counted as four individuals. This smells of a cover up by the department in the worst way.
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking
Cindy S. - belcamp, MD - Karma: Bad
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
Typical - December 30, 2008
This is just another way that an higher official can pass the blame to another lower staff member. The officer did the best of his ability, (without the support of his supervisor)and should not be prosecuted. Most criminals do not get 61 counts against them. How can a police officer doing his job get such a charge???? This is just passing the buck. NOT FAIR.
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking
seedless guy - edgewater, MD - Karma: Bad
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
Sgt. Weinstein - December 30, 2008
This is typical action on the part of the A.A.Co.police Dept.Perhaps a federal investigation is in order.The County should demand an outside independent investigation of this matter.To level 61 charges on this Sgt.is ludicrous and way beyond reason. Sgt. Weinstein can not be the sole officer responsible. What about the detectives & the lieutenant? I hope the Sgt. hires a very good attorney & sues the county.
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking
Lou Albertsen - Ocala, FL - Karma: Bad
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
Led to the slaughter? - December 30, 2008
Why is Sgt. Weinstein the only one being focused on? Was he capable of singlehandedly maintaining the surveillance, conducting the chase, supervising, making the stop and arresting the suspects? I know of only one person capable of those acts and he lives in a comic book called Superman. If there is blame to be laid it should be placed on the shoulders(all the shoulders) it belongs with and not someone who is being made to be the scapegoat. 61 charges??? Did internal affairs feel that their case was not strong enough with 5 or 10 charges, that they needed 61? And how is it that Sgt. Weinsteins' supervisor remained unaware of this whole incident until it was almost concluded? A big question in my mind is who was in charge for 50 minutes after Sgt. Weinstein was relieved and who was in charge of the chase? I think there are more than a few questions that need to be answered and I do not believe Sgt. Weinstein can be the answer for all of them.
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking
Ed R. - brooklyn, MD - Karma: Bad
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
Elect them out! - December 30, 2008
If our own council members cannot see that this officer did his job, protected innocent lives...then I say VOTE them out and VOTE Officer Weinstein in! He has been on the force for 20 years and to level 60 plus charges for doing what..his job? I say at the least, fight for your job and demand justices! I grow tired of our council members acting on their own behalf and not of the best interest of the people who put them in office. I will help you vote them out if needs be! To protect and serve, not to be punished for doing his job people! Enough is enough. It would appear that he is getting more of a punishment then the people who committed the crime! Again our VOTE speaks, Officer Weinstein does not deserve this. Were is this man's union rep when needed? Funny, seems others have to cover up there mess by blaming a good cop yet again. Smart real smart fellows. This makes me mad to!
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking
J. Kammerdiener - Arnold, MD - Karma: Bad
Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0
what ? - December 30, 2008
Come on , I think this officer did a wonderful job, he do not deserved to be punished in that manner, I say the police have it hard, they are darned if they do and darned if they don't, He was only doing his job, this kind of stuff really make me mad, because when the police do their job they still get punished for some reason or the other, I do not know you Mr.Weinstein, but I say fight for your job, you did what you felt was best!!! Happy New Year
unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking
Alisa H. - College Park, MD - Karma: Bad
If you encounter other problems, please email ewiffin@capitalgazette.com and include your name, username, and any errors or messages that are displayed. The more information you can provide, the better able we will be to assist you.