|
Opinion
Editor's notebookPublished 07/19/08
SURPRISE, SURPRISE - We don't mean to sound unappreciative of the efforts of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Inspector General. Still: If it costs federal officials more than $250,000 to produce a report containing things everyone already knows, what's the going rate for coming up with something new? And is there any way we could be paid it? The report was issued after U.S. Sen. Barbara Mikulski, way back in 2005, asked for an independent evaluation of the progress of the Chesapeake Bay Program. That program is led by the EPA but involves other federal and state agencies assigned roles in the bay cleanup...
|
| #1 - Hundreds protest taxes at City Dock (19 comments) |
| #2 - Pharmacist accused of dealing drugs (15 comments) |
| #3 - Jones family to sue county, Board of Ed (14 comments) |
| #4 - Cohen tries to ward off Moyer comparisons (11 comments) |
| #5 - Election fight awaits O'Malley (6 comments) |
If you encounter other problems, please email ewiffin@capitalgazette.com and include your name, username, and any errors or messages that are displayed. The more information you can provide, the better able we will be to assist you.
In order to post or vote on a comment, you must be signed in with a hometownannapolis account.
If you encounter other problems, please email ewiffin@capitalgazette.com and include your name, username, and any errors or messages that are displayed. The more information you can provide, the better able we will be to assist you.