Market House prepares for several new vendors

Flower shop, deli sign temporary leases

By RYAN JUSTIN FOX Staff Writer

Published 07/08/09

City work crews yesterday began removing temporary partitions as they prepare the troubled Market House for new tenants for the first time in nearly four years.

J. Henson - The Capital
City work crews Tuesday began removing temporary partitions as they prepare the troubled Market House for new tenants for the first time in nearly four years.

SLIDESHOW

Annapolis Market House

The Market House, One of Annapolis' signature locations, now sits nearly empty

Several businesses have signed leases to operate in the historic downtown building at least through the summer.

"We read about the charrette (the city held for the Market House) and figured it would be a good opportunity," said Joel Scharfer, business manager for Flowers by Donna on Maryland Avenue.

The floral shop signed a six-month lease with the city late last week and should move into Market House next week.

Baltimore-based Atwater's -...

This story has expired!
You can purchase the full text in our news archives.

YOUR COMMENTS

RULES OF PARTICIPATION

If you encounter other problems, please email ewiffin@capitalgazette.com and include your name, username, and any errors or messages that are displayed. The more information you can provide, the better able we will be to assist you.

In order to post or vote on a comment, you must be signed in with a hometownannapolis account.

Take a look at a summary of Commenting Guidelines.

Report Abuse or Vote In order to allow the user community the ability to collectively rank the value of comments posted on the Capital Gazette websites we have implemented a thumbs-up/down system. All logged-in users may participate by voting up/down each comment. If others vote on your comment, your individual score will go up/down depending on the votes. Initially, everyone starts with a score of zero, and must earn credits to have significant voting weight. Individuals with higher scores will have more voting weight. 0

Comment removed by HometownAnnapolis staff. - 2009-07-09 01:15:49

Staff message: Why is this comment hidden?

unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking. Why is this comment hidden?

- Karma: Neutral

I agree - 2009-07-08 17:06:43

Turnout is abysmal and we (voters) can only blame ourselves when our Mayor wins with about 3000 votes.
But as to the last 4 years, well, let's just say that Hoover had the naming rights to City Hall.
I think that the last 8 years have opened many eyes. There is a petition to get a City Manager in place--imagine that, trained competent management in charge of a city! What a concept. And there have been many more voices (both pro and con) speaking out over the past 4 years.
Really a non-issue, but if the Mayor is so adored and supported, why was she hiding behind tinted glass at the parade last weekend?

unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking. Why is this comment hidden?

John F. - Annapolis, MD - Karma: Good

RE: Eminent Domain - 2009-07-08 13:24:19

John F.,
The Mayor and the city officials do not act in a vacuum. The residents of Annapolis voted this mayor into office twice and appear to support just about everything Mayor Moyer and the others have done. If there are people that object to how Annapolis is run I would love to see them speak up at council meetings, write or call officials and perhaps go to the polls to vote when I vote (my primary residence is Annapolis). Voter turnout in this community is abysmal. If you do not participate in your government and speak out, you have no other choice than to remain content with the actions they take; good or bad. That's how democracy works.

unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking. Why is this comment hidden?

T. Williams - Virginia Beach, VA - Karma: Neutral

Eminent Domain? - 2009-07-08 12:05:49

Why does the Capital keep saying the City took it back using eminent domain? This thing was settled before that wacky idea ever came to fruition.
Yes, the city said they would try to use it; but many legal experts said there was not a chance. But ultimately, the settled the case and ended up paying $2.5 million for a building they had owned for over 150 years.
Which brings the question up AGAIN, if our current administration was able to undo 150 years of history and incur a $2.5 million cost in 8 years....why are we allowing them to be involved yet again? Do we ever learn?

unhide Comment hidden due to low ranking. Why is this comment hidden?

John F. - Annapolis, MD - Karma: Good